Detection of bridge impact

Automated monitoring systems accelerate the response evaluations, help quantify the damage and enable identification of offending drivers for prosecution and recovery of costs

 

  • 11 bridges monitored
  • Accelerometers used to detect impact
  • Video cameras record the incident before and after impact
  • Automated reporting
  • Notification direct to asset manager
  • On-line platform for reviewing data on network-wide map
  • Print-out report for ease of distribution

 

Bridge impact from over-height road vehicles is a persistent problem for bridges with low headroom across the London Underground network. Initiatives to warn drivers have reduced the frequency, but not eliminated the occurrences. Transport for London have chosen to take a combined approach of increasing driver awareness, use of collision protection beams and capturing evidence for prosecution of offending drivers.

London Underground installed three of James Fisher Testing Services’ (JFTS) BridgeStrike systems on bridges which were prone to impact and further expanded 18 months later, adding a further eight systems to other sites.

BridgeStrike constantly monitors each bridge for sudden movements, detecting the shock. By learning the normal behaviour, the differences between passing trains and actual impact can be distinguished. When a potential strike is identified by the algorithms, recordings of accelerometer measurements at critical positions and video evidence covering a period before and after the impact are captured.

Notification is sent automatically to the bridge manager(s) and a report is presented including images, assisting the speed of response to inspect and assess the bridge damage. The internet accessible platform, where all BridgeStrike monitored sites are visible along with their current status and history of previous impacts. The platform is accessible from any computer or internet connected device (mobile phone/tablet).

The data recorded has proven successful for the prosecution of drivers and continues to improve the awareness for high vehicle drivers and their employers.

 

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike.jpg

 


Installation

The implementation of the systems was managed by JFTS, including planning, installation and continued operation and maintenance for multiple years. JFTS installed the most recent eight systems by a turn-key approach, responsible as Principal Contractor, providing the planning applications, traffic management, and plant for access at height.
 
Holding safety at the core of both JFTS and Transport for London, we collaborated in
 
“Throughout the installation of all systems on all assets, James Fisher Testing Services’ have shown a high standard of compliance in their safety documentation and site teams.” Paul Wilkinson, Senior Construction Supervisor TfL
 
developing site safety documentation that satisfied the needs of all and simplified the actions for controlling, checking and reporting the works.
 
Innovations
JFTS worked with London Underground to further develop the functions of BridgeStrike for the implementation of the later eight installations, including a custom dashboard to display the vital information in an easily readable format. Enhancements were discussed and those most useful for the management of these bridges were implemented. Some bridges have added displacement sensors to detect global movements of the superstructures which confirm bearing offsets caused directly by vehicle impact.
 
The automated post-processing has added functionality in which the data collected is analysed to quantify the energy magnitude of impact sustained by the structure. As data is collected on previous impacts this will help inform the bridge managers of the likelihood of damage sustained. If an impact is of less energy than those previously experienced, then detrimental damage is less likely and the structure might remain open, even before site inspection can be conducted.
 
Some potential impacts detected and recorded are identified as being caused by passing trains. The patterns in these are being used to detect wheel-flats of the trains.
 
FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike6.jpg

 

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike2.jpg

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike3.jpg

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike4.jpg

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike5.jpg

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike (1).jpg

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike8.jpg

FINAL - Case Study - LUL Bridgestrike7.jpg


The use of BridgeStrike systems has brought cost benefit to the management of these bridges. Response has become easier and quicker. Identification of offending vehicles means that many of the costs associated with impacts (closure, examination and remedial works) can now be recovered from the offender.

Download the case study

BACK TO TOP